Sometimes
technology can go too far. I recently purchased a cell
phone that came with an instruction manual as thick as a
brick. I use a telephone for one reason: to make calls.
I didn’t buy a cell phone to play video games, take
fuzzy photographs, download disco music, get directions
to my house or monitor the stock market.
I know how to punch in a phone
number, so I threw away the manual. I do not regret for
a second that I am using only one percent of the
capabilities of this technological marvel.
Sometimes
racing engines turn into the four-stroke equivalents of
cell phones. Racers who are dazzled by the latest
gadgets, tricks and technology can lose sight of the
basics. The purpose of a racing engine is to produce
maximum power efficiently and reliably within the limits
of the rules. Period.
An engine is an induction system, cylinder heads,
a short block and a valvetrain. It doesn’t matter
whether the engine competes in Formula One, Indy cars,
NASCAR, or drag racing. If I’m talking to an engine
builder in another form of racing, those are the parts
that we talk about. All of the high-tech electronics,
exotic materials and expensive trinkets are meaningless
if an engine isn’t built on a solid foundation.
There are certain fundamental truths about racing
engines. The first is that the cylinders must be sealed.
That seems simple, but it is difficult to achieve.
Engine simulation programs that boldly predict a certain
level of performance assume that the cylinders are
properly sealed, but that is sometimes an unwarranted
assumption. It’s much more important to optimize
cylinder sealing than to worry about 10 cfm of airflow.
A
cylinder hone may not seem very sophisticated compared
to a computer-controlled flow bench or dynamometer, but
it is an essential tool of engine building. It takes
years of experience and decades of data to learn how to
hone for maximum power. Savvy engine builders have
information on block hardness that extends back to the
days of production castings. They know the different
honing techniques that are required for grey iron,
compacted graphite and ductile alloys. They recognize
that ring material and profile make a huge difference
when honing.
Oil
ring tension does not necessarily determine whether a
racing engine has powder-dry exhaust ports or black,
oily ports. A dry engine is the result of honing the
cylinders correctly and selecting the best ring package
for the application. Of course, ring tension can be
increased to the point that it will cover up an
incorrect hone, but the motor will barely turn over, and
it certainly won’t make good power.
The
quality of the pistons is also crucial to cylinder
sealing. I scrutinize ring grooves carefully because I
know that not all pistons are created equal. Machining a
first-rate piston begins with the blueprint; are the
ring grooves located properly so that the lands are
thick enough to support the rings? I’ve seen too many
“trick” pistons with the ring package squeezed into
a narrow space that’s dictated by the piston pin
height. If the land under the top ring deflects and
breaks the cylinder seal, then the engine simply can’t
perform to its potential.
Exotic lubricants and expensive coatings are a
waste of money if the short block clearances aren’t
right. When the bearing and piston clearances are wrong,
the parts are going to fail. Before spending big money
on costly treatments, invest in a good set of
micrometers and make sure that the clearances are
correct.
The most important characteristic in a cylinder
head is the ratio of the throat size to the valve size.
That’s never mentioned in ads and articles that focus
on flow numbers, and it’s not even considered in
engine simulation programs. The fact that a port moves a
certain amount of dry air in a steady-state flow bench
test has only a tenuous connection to real world
operating conditions. In a running engine, the flow is
constantly in a dynamic state as the valves open and
close and the piston rises and falls. The fact that a
port flows X cfm at a predetermined depression has
little relevance; the true test is whether the port
develops a signal quickly in real time as engine rpm
increases. And that can’t be measured on any flow
bench.
A software program may calculate that an engine
needs bigger valves, and the flow bench might confirm
that larger valves indeed produce more airflow – but
the engine may not care. In fact, it might not even
accelerate as well as it did with small valves. Why?
Because stuffing bigger valves into a cylinder can pinch
off the airflow between the valve heads and the cylinder
walls. The valve sizes must be in proportion to the bore
diameter. Increasing the diameter of the valve 10
percent to pick up a 5 percent increase in airflow is
never a good bargain.
Why does an engine with standard parts run better
than one with all of the latest tricks, gizmos and
gadgets? It’s usually because the builder took care of
the basics with good cylinder seal, correct clearances,
and a properly matched induction system. If you want
technology for technology’s sake, my advice is to buy
a cell phone.
#
# #
|